How Dale Works
From FDD upload to compliance report in minutes.
Dale mirrors the review process a franchise attorney would perform manually: reading every section, checking it against the applicable rules, and producing a written analysis — compressed from days into a single session.
Request AccessApproach
Modeled on how an experienced
franchise attorney reviews.
A franchise attorney reviewing an FDD doesn’t approach it as 23 isolated items. They read it as an integrated document — one where disclosures must reconcile across the body, exhibits must square with the obligations they describe, and federal, NASAA, and state-level requirements all apply at once. Dale’s review process is built around these same integration patterns, not around a checklist.
Read the whole document
Cover page through the final exhibit. Every section is evaluated in context — not as a search target. Items omitted entirely are subject to the same scrutiny as items that are merely deficient.
Reconcile what should agree
Disclosures, exhibits, and financial statements that are supposed to align are checked against each other, not as isolated items. Internal consistency across the document is part of compliance, and it is the kind of review work that gets missed under deadline pressure.
Apply the full rulebook on every pass
The FTC Franchise Rule, NASAA Guidelines, and state-specific examiner expectations aren’t sequential checks. They’re layered into a single rulebook that’s applied to each section together — the same way a senior attorney holds all three frameworks in mind during a single read-through.
Process
Parallel item review,
reconciled into one analysis.
After the document is sectioned, every item is reviewed in parallel against the full rulebook. The findings from those parallel reviews are then reconciled against each other for inconsistencies, and the reconciliation discoveries feed back into the original findings — so what ships at the end isn’t a list of section-by-section observations, it’s a coherent analysis that has been re-weighed against the document as a whole.
Items reviewed in parallel
The document is sectioned by item and exhibit, then every section is reviewed in parallel against the rules that apply to it. The full rulebook — FTC, NASAA, and state-specific requirements layered together — is applied to each section in a single pass. Where a finding is clear against the rulebook, Dale resolves it on its own. Where the call requires judgment that should belong to the attorney, the question is flagged and escalated for human decision rather than auto-resolved.
Findings reconciled across sections
Key findings from the parallel reviews are checked against each other for discrepancies of two kinds: numeric (figures that should match across the document but don’t) and substantive (claims that should agree across items but contradict each other). These cross-section discrepancies are the kind that don’t surface from any single item read in isolation, and they’re a common source of state deficiency letters.
Original findings refined
The discoveries from the reconciliation pass feed back into the individual item findings. A claim that looked clean in isolation may be downgraded once cross-checking reveals a contradiction; a borderline finding may be upgraded once a related figure or statement elsewhere in the document lines up against it. The output is a coherent set of findings that has been re-weighed against the document as a whole — not just the section-by-section first pass.
Output
Two artifacts ship with
every review.
At the end of the review, you receive a structured compliance report and a draft comment letter — both editable in the platform, both anchored to the underlying findings, both formatted for the audiences they’re intended for.
Internal
Compliance report
External
Comment letter draft
What happens next
The review is the starting point,
not the finish line.
Advise the client
Walk the client through their compliance posture using the structured findings. The severity grading prioritizes the conversation: address critical issues before the next registration filing, flag items that need attention before the annual update, and confirm the areas where their disclosures already meet the mark.
Submit to the state
When handling a state registration filing, the auto-generated comment letter is a head start on the correspondence state examiners expect. Refine it with knowledge of the particular examiner’s priorities and the client’s situation, then submit.
Track over time
FDD compliance is an annual cycle. Every review your firm runs is preserved. When the same client returns for their annual update, you can compare this year’s findings against last year’s and see exactly what was addressed and what is new.
Common questions
How long does a review take?
Most FDDs are analyzed in minutes. Total time depends on document length, but the typical turnaround is measured in minutes, not hours.
Does Dale replace attorney review?
No. Dale performs the thorough first-pass analysis that surfaces findings. Professional judgment — what is material, how to advise the client, what to include in the comment letter — remains with the attorney.
How current is the compliance rulebook?
The rulebook is continuously maintained to reflect the latest FTC guidance, NASAA commentary, and state-level registration changes. When the regulatory landscape shifts, the rulebook is updated before your next review.
Can findings be traced back to a specific rule?
Yes — every finding cites the regulation it implicates, includes a quoted excerpt of the relevant passage, and links to the source page in the document. There is no finding without a citation.